VITN: “Timing Isn’t Everything for Value Investors”

A quick article from the WSJ reminding us that the patient investor will be rewarded eventually.

Timing Isn’t Everything for Value Investors

By SPENCER JAKAB

They say good things come to those who wait. Trouble is, most people can’t, or won’t, stick around for long—at least not when it comes to their money.

That helps explain a great mystery of investing—why, despite the hundreds of millions of dollars spent each year on advice and management fees, a free lunch of sorts has persisted in the form of value investing.

For example, Brandes Institute sliced U.S. stocks into 10 deciles by value characteristics. From 1980 to 2010, the cheapest outperformed the dearest by 575%.

Such an opportunity shouldn’t persist, but it does. That is probably because there are bad periods for value stocks of three or more years interspersed among the good ones. Those are long enough for fickle fund investors to dump their managers, often forcing them to sell holdings.

The bipolar years since the financial crisis have been one of those dry stretches with either everything languishing or “risk-on” rallies mainly lifting growth stocks. With Greece coming to a boil with a crucial election next month, value stocks may once again get the attention they deserve. The years after long periods of poor relative performance are some of the best for patient value managers.

Value investors have dubbed this opportunity “time arbitrage,” and it is high time for it to work its magic. Russell Investment ranks the relative performance of its five main growth and value indexes each year. The last time a value index ranked on top and a growth index on bottom was the awful year of 2008. From 2009 through 2011, and so far this year, a growth index was the best performer and a value index came in last.

Consider value investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Its three worst years of investment performance relative to the broad market came in 1967, 1980 and 1999. Its cumulative outperformance relative to the S&P 500 over the following three-year periods was 49%, 102% and 48%, respectively.

In times like these, with value in the doghouse, it isn’t only the likes of Mr. Buffett who can rack up gaudy numbers. Individuals with no impatient investment committee to answer to also have an edge over fund managers. Time is on their side.

Hope For the Liberal Arts Majors

A good quick article from the WSJ titled “Wealth or Waste? Rethinking the Value of a Business Major.” I was happy to see this article because as a history major with a masters in international relations I am afraid that at least on paper I am at a disadvantage to those with a finance degree. I would argue that all of the reading and work I have done on my own time outside of the classroom is in many ways equivalent to what many of peers did while in school, but I can’t exactly have a section of my resume that says, “I have read a ton of business books on my own time due to genuine interest in the subject matter.” Or a section that says, “I am good at fitting square pegs through round holes,” which I would argue is possibly my greatest strength.

Continue reading

PETS – Quarterly update .19/share vs .16 estimates

PETS reported Q3 EPS of .19/share vs. estimates of .16/share and .20/share last year. Revenues were $50.5M vs estimates of $44.7M and 12% higher than last year’s Q3 sales of $45.1M.. They acquired 150,000 new customers in the latest quarter, and saw reorders increase by 8% for the quarter YoY.

The company repurchased 118,000 shares during the quarter for approximately $1M.

If there is one complaint – and there shouldn’t be – it is that margins were squeezed due to aggressive pricing and higher ad spending. As I pointed out in my original write up http://www.chasingbrucegreenwald.com/2011/11/30/the-stock-has-fleas-but-the-business-doesnt-pets/, the company can still generate impressive returns on equity with tightened margins.

The stock traded up as much as 20% this morning as the 24% short interest scrambled to cover. While part of me was tempted to sell above $13 and lock in some profit, I have decided not to.

PETS is still a short term hold for me, and I am under invested as it is. I don’t see a need to generate a tax event only to sit in cash when PETS is yielding almost 5% for me.

My original thesis was that the market had over reacted to increased competition from online upstarts and big box retailers, and that the vets (with 67% of the market) would be the real losers of market share, not PETS.

That thesis remains intact, and while margins have contracted, the business remains able to generate high returns.

SSW – Special Situation – Closing out

SSW issued a press release confirming the conclusion of their tender offer for $15. Given that the tender offer was subject to pro-ration the spread remained wide throughout the process. Additionally, an odd lot provision of 99 shares or less guaranteed the tender for small holders. I was able to participate on a total of 198 shares through 2 different accounts, although my second lot of 99 was not as profitable as my first because it took a little while to get the second account set up. While the money hasn’t hit my accounts yet, there is a contra indicator in them and I expect to see the cash in the next 48-72 hours.
Continue reading

High Correlation Era Poised to End for Markets

Correlation across asset classes has been a thorn in the side of buy and hold value investors for the last few years. In fact, several of my customers have lamented that they have been reduced to keeping a large percentage of their portfolio dedicated to jumping in and out of liquid ETFs depending on the latest headlines from Europe in an effort to keep up with the quarterly performance demands of their investors.

While value has still existed in these markets, it seems that the gap between market price and intrinsic value has been slower to close as a “risk off” period can cause investors to head for the door despite the underlying fundamentals of the company in question. Additionally, all the fast money jumping in and out of ETFs is money that is not focused on finding and closing valuation gaps. A move away from this trend should increase the odds for the diligent investor willing to do the work required to pick individual stocks and patiently weight for Mr. Market to recognize the value under his nose.

High Correlation Era Poised to End for Markets Published: Thursday, 8 Dec 2011 | 9:15 PM ET Text Size By: Reuters

A high correlation between assets classes has been the hallmark of financial markets this year, with assets moving in seemingly perfect lock-step, but that panorama may be on the verge of breaking down, investors at the 2012 Reuters Investment Outlook summit said this week.

An unusually high level of uncertainty about the global economy spawned by the 2008 financial crisis has driven a “risk on, risk off” investment strategy across financial markets. U.S. and European fiscal woes have spurred the uncertainty, as has political unrest in North Africa and the Middle East, as well as the earthquake and tsunami that slammed Japan earlier this year. When the uncertainty subsides is unknown. But security selection and a “bottoms up” view of the investing landscape will return to the marketplace, and investors would be wise to make note, analysts at the summit said. “We would say that the extremely high, pair-wise correlation that we’ve seen in equities over the last several years is poised to drop,” Art Steinmetz, chief investment officer at OppenheimerFunds in New York, told the summit. “And therefore stock pickers will start to be able to prove their mettle once again,” Steinmetz said. The correlation of large-cap U.S. stocks has been about 85 percent in recent months — measured by the percentage of large-cap stocks that rise or fall in sync with the S&P 500 — while the correlation among other asset classes also has been high. The monthly change of eight asset classes in relation to the benchmark Standard & Poor’s 500 index [.SPX 1234.35 --- UNCH (0) ] has climbed to trading in sync almost half the time from almost never during most of the 1990s, according to Ned Davis Research.

The eight asset classes include MSCI indexes for international and emerging market stocks, spot gold, copper futures, three-month and 10-year U.S. Treasury debt, the euro and the Reuters-Jefferies CRB commodities index. For investors, a key insight will be knowing “when that correction finally breaks, and it will break at some point,” said Jane Buchan, chief executive of Pacific Alternative Asset Management Co LLC of Irvine, California. The high correlation will not break across the board, but a fair amount of dispersion in the price of similar stocks will likely be seen in technology and healthcare stocks, she said. “One of the interesting exercises to do is to think about in what industries are you likely to see greater dispersion and you’ll probably want to put your long-short equity book in those industries,” Buchan told the summit. The importance of betting on big themes, such as the rise in gold prices or the fallout from a highly indebted developed world, is likely to ebb as correlations fall, she said. A lack of dispersion has foiled investors’ returns. Ultra-low global interest rates, the Federal Reserve’s program of buying government bonds to increase money supply, and active central bank intervention in the Japanese yen and Swiss franc have been behind the historically low dispersion, according to FX Concepts LLC, one of the world’s largest currency hedge funds. The world’s major commerce currencies have typically traded in a range of about 20 percent, providing wide enough price swings to make money, said John Taylor, chairman and chief executive of FX Concepts. But this year the range for the currencies of the Group of 10 nations narrowed to 6 percent, the lowest since 2004, from a more typical spread between high and low of about 20 percent. The narrow band has wreaked havoc on the returns of FX Concepts’s global currency strategy, causing the fund to lose 17.8 percent through October of this year. Getting a strategy correct isn’t easy. Taylor, who called his returns this year “awful,” said his firm might make five or six mistakes for every three or four things it does right. “Our job is to ferret the places where you can make a bunch of money, and when there’s no bunches to be made you go crazy trying to find them,” said Taylor.

WATCH LIST – Cooper Tire

I am making a note to keep an eye on CTB. The company has a bit more debt than I would like and is clearly in a cyclical / commodity type business and a quick glance at gross margins does not seem to indicate that it is a low cost producer which I would also like to see. However, with the stock down more than 50% from its 2011 highs and an on going labor struggle, this may be a good place to sniff around for value.

WSJ: Labor Brawl Hits Cooper Tire >CTB (Dow Jones 12/07 15:33:29)

By Jeff Bennett Of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

FINDLAY, Ohio (Dow Jones)–Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. (CTB) workers, embroiled in a contract dispute that recalls old-style labor brawls, huddled this week around fire barrels outside the company’s plant here. Unusual at a time of high unemployment and labor peace in the auto industry, the scene has taken on the trappings of a 1960s battle: failed mediation, a lockout, sign-waving picketers, replacement workers and accusations flying on both sides. The clash between Cooper and its 1,050 union workers may signal a return to a more combative tone in the America’s industrial heartland as manufacturers look to lock in the wage cuts negotiated during the last recession and workers seek to recoup what they ceded. (This story and related background material will be available on The Wall Street Journal website, WSJ.com.) Three years ago, as the company tried to dig out of a financial hole, Cooper workers represented by the United Steelworkers union agreed to forgo raises and accepted a two-tiered wage system that started new hires at lower wages. Now, with Cooper profitable again, the union has pushed for a return to a single wage rate for all workers and lower health-care costs. “They have to understand that people are not going to keep working for less and less,” said Rodney Nelson, president of the USW local at the plant. “We are not asking for more, we are asking to get back the concessions we gave them.” Management offered signing bonuses and some wage increases, in exchange for productivity improvements, tighter vacation caps and more flexibility on pay. It also wants to keep the two-tier wage system, which pays entry-level workers about $13 an hour, about half what veteran workers make. Tiered wages were a centerpiece of the agreements reached across the auto industry during the crisis years. Whether they represent a temporary concession or a permanent fixture of labor contracts remains a contentious issue. “The bottom line is we need a competitive agreement,” said Chris Ostrander, president of Cooper’s North American tire operations. The company also has asked to restructure some job categories. “Not all jobs are created equal, nor should there be an expectation to pay an amount higher than what the market determines is fair,” he wrote local residents. The USW contract for Findlay expired Oct. 31. Union members rejected the company’s final offer the day before Thanksgiving, and Cooper locked out the workers the following Monday. In contrast, to the angry talk here, Cooper Tire’s top competitor Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (GT) has kept the peace with the United Steelworkers by exchanging worker concessions for investments in its North American plants and training workers to build more complex and pricier tires. As negotiations with a federal mediator stalled for Cooper this week, the company brought in replacement workers, who are making $17 an hour, plus a meal allowance, according to the union. The union filed charges Tuesday against the company with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging unfair labor practices. Mr. Ostrander declined to say how many replacements have been hired or discuss their pay. But he said he will keep them here as long as necessary to keep the plant running. Such workers are easy to find following years of layoffs in Central Ohio’s tire industry. “This stinks,” said Teresa Brown, 41, who has worked at the plant for the past 12 years and spent a rainy morning this week, hollering to passing motorists on Lima Avenue. “My husband and I both work in there. We have a kid in college, and I don’t know how I am going to pay for college– all because they want to be greedy. They are just trying to bully us.” Halfway up the block at another picket encampment, Chico Ramirez, 62, said he has worked at the plant for 25 years and vowed to stay out on the picket line. “We have to fight for the younger people,” he said between sips of coffee. “The thing that bothers us is that we gave them concessions to help them get back on their feet, and they are paying out bonuses instead of paying back the backbone of the company.” Cooper, which makes replacement tires under its own brand and supplies tire shops with private-label brands, lost $219.4 million in 2008, but has been profitable ever since, recording income of $83.6 million in 2009 and $163.9 million last year. This year, earnings for the first nine months were down 53%. The company blames high raw-material costs and slower sales. Mr. Ostrander said executives have taken concessions, including the loss of a pension plan, which was replaced with 401(k) plan, and higher health-care costs. “This is not a corporate greed story,” said Mr. Ostrander, noting that his father and brother were both union steelworkers. “We want to protect these folks from themselves. We want to make this plant competitive for the long term.” He suggested that there’s more at stake at Cooper than just wages and work rules. If the labor battle continues, “I have a concern for the future of this facility,” he said, “not only for the manufacturing, but it could affect what we decide to do with our headquarters.”

BAC – Berkowitz’s Bull Case

Fairholme Fund’s Bruce Berkowitz has been a vocal BAC bull over the last year or two. He began to build his 105,000,000 share position in the first quarter of 2010 when the stock traded between $15-$18 dollars and has continued to add shares as the price has fallen by more than 50%. The below is a link to a recent Fairholme BAC presentation that lays out the principals of value investing as well as the bull case for Bank of America as seen by Fairholme.

http://www.fairholmefunds.com/pdf/fairholme_stays_the_course.pdf

Disclosure: I am long BAC around $7.00

WATCH LIST – Foot Locker

I am making a note to keep an eye on Foot Locker. The company has a consistent earnings history, but does not appear overly cheap at a glance. However, as pointed out in today’s WSJ, roughly 35% of sales come from basketball categories, and the possible collapse of this year’s NBA season may lead to a decline in sales. Realistically I consider this unlikely – I really doubt that teenagers and men’s league players are going to stop buying sneakers because of an NBA lockout, but there is no harm in keeping an eye on the stock.

WSJ(11/17) Foot Locker Poised to Weather NBA’s Woes (Dow Jones 11/16 19:33:33) It is tough to be the “House of Hoops” without the hoops. It isn’t just players who stand to lose from the National Basketball Association’s potentially canceled season. Foot Locker Inc., which reports fiscal third-quarter earnings Thursday, also could suffer. The footwear chain with 3,400 stores world-wide and about a $3.5 billion market value derives roughly 35% of its sales from basketball categories, according to UBS Securities analyst Michael Binetti. A canceled season could mean a hit of roughly 27 cents to expected earnings of $1.71 a share next year, he estimates. There still is time for NBA players and management to reach a revenue-sharing agreement, of course. But with negotiations now giving way to litigation, this looks less likely. The season’s start already has been delayed until at least mid-December. The full brunt of this won’t be felt in Foot Locker’s third quarter, however, which ended in October. The company, which has been in the midst of an impressive turnaround, is expected to report earnings of 39 cents a share, up 18% year on year. Sales at stores open a year or more, a key metric, are expected to rise 5% to 6% from a year earlier. Coming quarters are where any NBA pain is more likely to show up. And if the season is canceled, Foot Locker’s shares could get benched. But any weakness may prove a buying opportunity because long-term trends remain encouraging. Foot Locker has gained market share from department-store rivals, has upped the quality of its offerings and is expanding profit margins, notes Sterne Agee. And weakness now could make it easier for the company to increase earnings next year when playing resumes. Smaller rival Finish Line Inc. also could stand to benefit. Finish Line shares have lagged behind Foot Locker’s in recent months, even though it has less exposure to basketball and to Europe, and a higher share of fast-expanding online sales. While Foot Locker has its “House of Hoops,” Finish Line has been snapping up small, specialty running stores in Texas and along the East Coast. Citigroup expects it to post 8% same-store sales growth for its November quarter when it reports results next month. For these footwear companies, at least, no NBA may be no disaster.

V.I.T.N. – Stock Pickers Shunned!

Whitney Tilson and other value investors have been suggesting that over the next several years the market is likely to be range bound due to global economic uncertainty. The below shows that more investors are moving away from stock pickers as the belief that individuals will be able to separate themselves from the pack fades.

While I agree that markets will likely be range bound, I believe that individuals will still be able to outperform. The argument below rests on those that believe that the fees they pay to hedge funds or mutual funds will be the difference in performance between index funds and hedge funds and mutual funds. As an individual investor picking stocks this is not a concern.

I continue to believe that individual investors will be able to outperform the markets over the next few years by searching for high yielding under valued stocks. The dividends may well wind up being the difference.

Continue reading